学术写作
4 个 · organized/repo_cards · 六阶段二十任务 · 方向综述 →
质量状态 Quality Gate
946已收录 946
36待复核 36
185已排除 185
公开榜单只展示已收录项目；待复核与已排除项目仍保留在仓库总库，不在此页传播。
研究阶段概览 Research Workflow
| # | 方向 | 数量 | 代表仓库 Top 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | 证据综述 | 159 | ChaokunHong/MetaScreener · asreview/asreview · vitorfs/parsifal |
首次收录 近 14 天 · 按日期统计
2026-08-26
15
2026-08-25
26
2026-08-24
12
2026-08-23
46
2026-08-22
44
2026-08-21
48
2026-08-20
47
2026-08-19
45
2026-08-18
60
2026-08-17
44
2026-08-16
48
2026-08-15
53
2026-08-14
53
2026-08-13
59
仓库导航 Leaderboard
旧分类链接兼容
organized/repo_cards · 学术方向；旧书签仍可访问，新统计不再使用这些字段。
方向榜单 Legacy
| 文献总结 | 159 | Aperivue/medsci-skills · 0x11c11e/awesome-ai-research-tools · Cris223511/systematic-review-data-analysis |
01
Aperivue/medsci-skills
面向医学研究的 Agent Skills——文献检索、报告规范与引用核查、统计、发表图表、投稿。兼容 Claude Code、Codex、Cursor 与 GitHub Copilot。由医师-研究者构建，在真实发表论文上验证。MIT 协议。Agent Skills for medical research — literature search, reporting-guideline & citation checks, statistics, publication figures, submission. Works with Claude Code, Codex, Cursor & GitHub Copilot. Built by a physician-researcher, tested on real publications. MIT.
269 ★
02
0x11c11e/awesome-ai-research-tools
一个专为辅助研究活动而精选的 AI 工具列表，涵盖文献综述、引文管理、数据分析等工具，面向希望借助 AI 提升研究工作流的研究人员、学生和从业者。A curated list of AI tools specifically designed to assist in research activities, including tools for literature reviews, citation management, data analysis, and more. This repository is intended for researchers, students, and professionals who want to leverage AI to enhance their research workflows.
+4/周
61 ★
03
Cris223511/systematic-review-data-analysis
系统综述数据分析仓库：基于机器学习技术的自闭症谱系障碍儿童情绪识别Data analysis repository for systematic literature review on emotion recognition in childrens with Autism Spectrum Disorder using machine learning techniques
0 ★
04
awabahmad469/composite-endpoints-audit
论文 "Composite endpoints sharing a name do not always share a definition — a registry-based audit of five systematic reviews, and why heterogeneity statistics do not detect the problem" 的配图与补充材料。Figures and supplementary materials accompanying the manuscript “Composite endpoints sharing a name do not always share a definition — a registry-based audit of five systematic reviews, and why heterogeneity statistics do not detect the problem.
0 ★