Papers · organized/paper_cards

论文

14 张论文卡片 · 评测基准 · 评测集

开放获取 全部 绿色 · 724
9️⃣ arXiv · Benchmarking Multimodal Memory for Realistic User-Agent Interactions(M3Exam)(⭐⭐⭐ 参考)
9️⃣ arXiv · 面向真实用户-Agent 交互的多模态记忆基准测试(M3Exam)(⭐⭐⭐ 参考)
arXiv:2606.07402 评测基准 评测集 OA · 绿色 被引 1 · S2

本文提出 M$^3$Exam,一个以查询为中心、基于真实用户-Agent 交互构建的多模态对话记忆基准,涵盖跨模态定位与隐式信息推断等多维度评估。M$^3$Exam is introduced, a query-centric multimodal conversational memory benchmark built on realistic user-agent interaction, with multi-dimensional evaluation spanning cross-modal grounding and implicit information inference.

5.2 ForeSci:研究判断型 agent 评测
arXiv:2606.00644 评测基准 评测集 OA · 绿色 被引 0 · S2 + OpenAlex

本文提出 ForeSci,一个时间受控的基准,用于评估 LLM Agent 是否能从历史证据中做出前瞻性研究判断,并在四种骨干模型上评测原生 LLM、Hybrid RAG 以及三种 research-agent 适配方案。This work introduces ForeSci, a temporally controlled benchmark for evaluating whether LLM agents can make such forward-looking research judgements from historical evidence, and evaluates native LLMs, Hybrid RAG, and three research-agent adaptations across four backbones.

MMLongEmbed: 多模态嵌入模型长上下文基准测试
arXiv:2606.14747 评测基准 评测集 OA · 绿色 被引 0 · S2 + OpenAlex

本文提出 MMLongEmbed,首个面向长上下文场景评估 MEM 的综合基准,并发现现有架构严重依赖浅层特征匹配,难以捕捉深层语义与结构依赖。This work introduces MMLongEmbed, the first comprehensive benchmark for evaluating MEMs in long-context scenarios, and finds that current architectures rely heavily on superficial feature matching and struggle to capture deep semantic and structural dependencies.

🔴 保留 · `Toward Secure LLM Agents: Threat Surfaces, Attacks, Defenses, and Benchmarking`
🔴 保留 · `Toward Secure LLM Agents: Threat Surfaces, Attacks, Defenses, and Benchmarking`
arXiv:2606.10749 评测基准 评测集 OA · 绿色 被引 3 · S2

文中指出,安全的 LLM Agent 需要显式的信任边界、原则化的权限控制、具备溯源能力的 state 管理,以及与真实运行场景对齐的评估实践;现有 benchmark 仍未能充分覆盖长程、具状态、对部署敏感的风险。It is argued that secure LLM agents require explicit trust boundaries, principled privilege control, provenance-aware state management, and evaluation practices aligned with realistic operational settings, as well as existing benchmarks still underrepresent long-horizon, stateful, and deployment-sensitive risks.

🔴 保留 · `DeNovoSWE: Scaling Long-Horizon Environments for Generating Entire Repositories from Scratch`
🔴 保留 · `DeNovoSWE: Scaling Long-Horizon Environments for Generating Entire Repositories from Scratch`
arXiv:2606.10728 评测基准 评测集 OA · 绿色 被引 2 · S2

在 DeNovoSWE 上对 Qwen3-30B-A3B 进行微调可显著提升长程 SWE 性能,在具有挑战性的 BeyondSWE-Doc2Repo benchmark 上将其得分从 5.8% 提升至 47.2%。Fine-tuning Qwen3-30B-A3B on DeNovoSWE substantially improves long-horizon SWE performance, raising its score on the challenging BeyondSWE-Doc2Repo benchmark from 5.8% to 47.2%.

条目A1:EvoArena + EvoMem — 动态环境下的LLM Agent记忆演进基准(arXiv:2606.13681)
arXiv:2606.13681 评测基准 评测集 OA · 绿色 被引 0 · S2 + OpenAlex

介绍 EvoArena 基准套件,将环境变化建模为跨终端、软件与社会领域的渐进式更新序列;并提出 EvoMem,一种基于 patch 的记忆范式,将记忆演化记录为结构化的更新历史,使 Agent 能通过记忆的变化推理环境的演化。EvoArena is introduced, a benchmark suite that models environment changes as sequences of progressive updates across terminal, software, and social domains, and EvoMem is proposed, a patch-based memory paradigm that records memory evolution as structured update histories, enabling agents to reason about environmental evolution through changes in their memory.

9️⃣ arXiv · 下一代云原生内存数据库:从 Redis 到 Valkey ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 必读评测
arXiv:2510.19805 评测基准 评测集 OA · 绿色 被引 0 · S2 + OpenAlex

本研究对新兴的内存键值存储进行了全面的性能与可行性评估,突出了性能、兼容性与长期可行性(包括项目成熟度、社区支持与持续开发)之间的权衡。This study presents a comprehensive performance and viability assessment of the emerging in-memory key-value stores and highlights trade-offs between performance, compatibility, and long-term viability, including project maturity, community support, and sustained development.

2️⃣ arXiv · Generating Leakage-Free Benchmarks for Robust RAG Evaluation(⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 必读评测方法论)
arXiv · Generating Leakage-Free Benchmarks for Robust RAG Evaluation(⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 必读评测方法论)
arXiv:2605.08838 评测基准 评测集 OA · 绿色 被引 0 · S2 + OpenAlex

本文提出了 SeedRG,一个用于缓解 knowledge leakage 并应对 benchmark aging 问题的半合成 benchmark 生成 pipeline。SeedRG is introduced, a semi-synthetic benchmark generation pipeline that mitigates knowledge leakage and addresses the issue of benchmark aging.

2. Systemic Measurement Bias in LLM Inference Benchmarking
LLM Inference Benchmarking 中的系统性测量偏差
arXiv:2605.24217 评测基准 评测集 OA · 绿色 被引 0 · S2 + OpenAlex

本文提出一个无偏的多进程 evaluation 框架,能够有效分散 client 端负载,从而在每秒数千次 query 以上的生产规模下实现对 LLM 的精确、可复现 profiling。This work proposes an unbiased, multi-process evaluation framework that effectively distributes client-side load, enabling accurate, reproducible profiling of LLMs at production scales exceeding thousands of queries per second.

1️⃣1️⃣ arXiv · RAGCap-Bench: Benchmarking Capabilities of LLMs in Agentic RAG Systems(⭐⭐⭐ 参考)
arXiv · RAGCap-Bench: Benchmarking Capabilities of LLMs in Agentic RAG Systems(⭐⭐⭐ 参考)
arXiv:2510.13910 评测基准 评测集 被引 5 · S2

本文提出 RAGCap-Bench,一个面向能力的 benchmark,用于对 agentic RAG workflow 中的中间任务进行细粒度评测,并构建了典型 LLM 错误的分类体系以设计针对性评测问题。This work proposes RAGCap-Bench, a capability-oriented benchmark for fine-grained evaluation of intermediate tasks in agentic RAG workflows, and constructs a taxonomy of typical LLM errors to design targeted evaluation questions.

1. AlphaEval: Evaluating Agents in Production
AlphaEval: 在生产环境中评估 Agent
arXiv:2604.12162 评测基准 评测集 OA · 绿色 被引 1 · S2

本工作提出 AlphaEval,一个基于真实生产环境的基准,包含来自七家在其核心业务中部署 AI Agent 的公司的 94 个任务,覆盖六个 O*NET (Occupational Information Network) 领域;并贡献了一套从需求到基准的构建框架,将从需求到评估的完整流程标准化。This work presents AlphaEval, a production-grounded benchmark of 94 tasks sourced from seven companies deploying AI agents in their core business, spanning six O*NET (Occupational Information Network) domains, and contributes a requirement-to-benchmark construction framework that standardizes the entire pipeline from requirement to evaluation.

Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4
Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4
arXiv:2303.12712 评测基准 评测集 OA · 绿色 被引 4391 · S2

认为(该早期版本的)GPT-4 属于新一代具备更通用智能的 LLM(与 ChatGPT、谷歌 PaLM 等并列),并讨论了这些模型不断增强的能力及其影响。It is argued that (this early version of) GPT-4 is part of a new cohort of LLMs (along with ChatGPT and Google's PaLM for example) that exhibit more general intelligence than previous AI models, and the rising capabilities and implications of these models are discussed.

Mathematical Capabilities of ChatGPT
ChatGPT 的数学能力
arXiv:2301.13867 评测基准 评测集 OA · 绿色 被引 603 · S2

研究发现,ChatGPT 最成功地被用作数学助手,用于查询事实、充当数学搜索引擎和知识库接口;GPT-4 还可被用于本科水平的数学问题,但在研究生难度的题目上表现不佳。It is found that ChatGPT can be used most successfully as a mathematical assistant for querying facts, acting as a Mathematical search engine and knowledge base interface, and GPT-4 can additionally be used for undergraduate-level mathematics but fails on graduate-level difficulty.

Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generation
ChatGPT 生成的代码真的正确吗?面向代码生成的大型语言模型严格评估
arXiv:2305.01210 评测基准 评测集 OA · 绿色 被引 2078 · S2

EvalPlus——一个用于严格基准测试 LLM 生成代码功能正确性的代码合成评估框架,通过 LLM 与基于 mutation 的策略驱动的自动测试输入生成器,为给定评估数据集补充大量新生成的测试用例。EvalPlus -- a code synthesis evaluation framework to rigorously benchmark the functional correctness of LLM-synthesized code and augments a given evaluation dataset with large amounts of test-cases newly produced by an automatic test input generator, powered by both LLM and mutation-based strategies.